238
Oh no! Not getting Manchin's endorsement will really be a albatross for Harris in the West Virginia race where Trump won 68% to 29% in 2020.
Like I give a flying fuck what Joe Manchin's DINO ass thinks
He’s a fucking tool; I don’t expect she’ll care much. Also: what an absolutely fucking idiotic hill for him to die on.
Oh wow, the republican infiltrator isnt supporting the democrats.
I'm sooooooooo surprised.
That is an endorsement in of itself.
he is a DINO
Not even. He officially left the Dems and registered as independent earlier this year.
Then re-registered as a Dem when Biden was about to drop out. Then re-re-registered as an Indie when he realized he wasn't going to get handed to nomination over Harris.
I for one am very happy to rid the party of these scumbags: Manchin, Gabbard, Sinema.
Depressingly, also Fetterman.
Fetterman is bad on Israel-Palestine but I thought he was otherwise ok re: democracy, women's rights, etc? Am I wrong? He's not my rep so I'm actually asking.
He always struck me as a guy who is who he is. He would fail any ideology test because he goes by his gut rather than any ideological compass. I think he felt his supporters were being a bit mercurial for opposing him so vehemently on Israel. Not really an excuse, but I think he just lost his shit and lost his way. So probably a decent guy but he has to do a lot of work to repair that bridge and I have no idea if he's up to it.
But I could be wrong.
Gabbard and Sinema are people that can be replaced with other democrats, but let’s not fool ourselves into thinking a more progressive person would likely get elected for Manchin’s West Virginia seat.
Manchin may suck, but he caucuses with the dems and puts the dems 2 seats over the majority line. Which means his existence currently allows the Chuck Schumer to replace Mitch McConnell, which means the dems control what comes to the floor in the senate.
They just can't pass anything. But yeah, it is still better than what the other side would bring to the floor.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
An independent now. Not even a DINO.
More like a Dixiecrat. Old school southern Democrat.
Honestly, I’ll take it.
Dude could be a Home Depot Halloween skeleton for all I care. He caucuses with the Dems, which means that he helps push the Dems over 50% in the senate, which means the Dems control political appointments and what get brought to the floor.
I’ll take him over Mitch McConnell back in power.
load more comments
(1 replies)
This guy sucks.
Who cares about this dinosaur, like anyone is surprised?
He's going to try and run for governor in West Virginia, then run for President in 2028, without a doubt.
Then shouldn't he back Harris so that there are still elections in 2028?
They will still need to hold "elections" and they will need someone with a D next to their name to win every 12-16 years to keep up a facade
then run for President in 2028
As a.....democrat?
The fact that Biden called for this exact same thing and Manchin was ok endorsing him but has to make a big scene when a non-white woman calls for doing the same thing basically tells you everything you need to know about Manchin
This pearl clutching very much reads to me like he was looking for an excuse and this was the first one that turned up.
load more comments
(8 replies)
Can someone kick this guy in the nuts? I don't really care about this news, I just think that should happen to him, every day.
Forced Birther coal baron Joe Manchin is upset at Harris for threatening his cash cow fillibuster. News at 11
Why not just make the filibuster what it used to be and require the people who want to wield it to hold the floor for hours upon hours with no break? Some of it was silly. Some of it heroic. Either way, it required someone to truly be willing to stand behind their beliefs and, thus, was used much less often.
I also liked the idea of a minority vote (2/5) to sustain a filibuster. If you don't have 40 supporters, on the floor, then the filibuster ends.
it required someone to truly be willing to stand behind their beliefs
Conservatives don't typically have these, and the ones that do know how unpopular they are. That's why they fight against any attempt to reign it in.
This seems like such a fair way to add some discomfort to filibustering and making it a bit less appealing.
Republicans can endorse Harris all day long and I'm here for it.
Manchin endorsing Harris would have actually done her a disservice.
Oh no! Anyways…
Manchin was not going to endorse her anyway.
It's 42 days to the election, people are voting, if he was going to endorse her it would have been at the convention.
True
I'd seen the quote, but not the withholding of endorsement. Well, I guess he's going to join the 'both sides bad' crowd.
Still. What does his opinion matter? He's leaving the Senate next year so his proper alt-Right replacement can take over...
load more comments
(7 replies)
Manchin LOL. What a piece of work.
"It’s the only thing that keeps us talking ~~and~~ instead of working together."
Does this make Manchin a Tankie?
Manchin not endorsing IS an endorsement. Harris should run commercials.
fuck that guy... fuck him with a retractable baton
load more comments
(3 replies)
Holy Grail? An item given no special meaning in the Bible, and was blown out of proportion in importance by fiction writers a thousand years later? I guess Manchin doesn't really think the filibuster is too important then.
No special meaning and not in the Constitution.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
238 points (93.8% liked)
politics
18928 readers
4395 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS