-40

'Left-wing lunatic' and 'a disgrace': How Trump and Harris describe each other (www.bbc.com)

submitted 5 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Even in terms of diction, Harris comes off as the more intelligent and well-spoken candidate. Between these two, as clearly the better candidate.

[-] [email protected] -4 points 1 day ago

Half of the country doesn't agree with you.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

At least they’re not socialists.

[-] [email protected] -3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

At the end of the day both parties work for the same owners..

[-] [email protected] -1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Not exactly:

As of late June 2024, zero CEOs of Forbes top 100 corporations had donated to Trump. As analyzed in a previous Chartbook, Trump’s ultra rich donors consist of idiosyncratic billionaire money.

https://adamtooze.substack.com/p/chartbook-300-vance-trump-and-the

[-] [email protected] -2 points 5 days ago

BBC News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for BBC News:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx20np62x88o

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024

-40 points (13.0% liked)

politics

18928 readers

3129 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News