this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

8615 readers
884 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

To go with what a lot of people in here are saying about marketing being a very important aspect, and also point out for Indies it's continual marketing that's important. Indies don't always sell well right away you kind of got to keep pushing at it. Heck the game came out what a week and a half ago? They're already thrown in the towel?

Although, after watching the trailer I'm not sure how unique this game really was. Certainly looks like a couple dozen other games I've seen come out in the last few years.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

If memory serves, it took hollow knights a few weeks too

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

You'd think that Panic as a publisher would help them with marketing

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Excluding the game name from the title will surely help the developer

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

One thing I haven't seen mentioned here already, is that the game is only on Steam. Which limits the customer base to Steam, yes it's a massive audience but they're missing out on free sales by not listing it on places like GOG, Itch.io, Gamejolt, etc

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The reality is those other platforms won't make much difference on sales at all, and with a limited indie dev team they've made a wise decision to focus on the largest PC storefront.

It's the same reason a lot of indies don't target Linux, the effort vs reward simply doesn't make sense for small teams. Anyone who says "But Unity and Unreal Engine support Linux! It's literally two clicks!" has no idea what they're talking about and hasn't actually been through the process of releasing a game for multiple platforms.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There's a pretty big difference between "Selling the exact same binaries on different stores" and "Supporting a whole different OS with it's own alien ecosystem" =P

In the case of store fronts, we're talking about more sales (even if it's extremely low) that literally take 0 effort to do.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

No, see you've fallen into the exact trap I just described. The "exact same binaries" is not true. The Steam build will have the Steam overlay SDK integrated into it. The GOG build won't. Each store may require its own SDK and API integrated into the build. But even they were the exact same binaries, you've still got to think about QA, build pipelines, storefront configuration (including achievements and online subsystems like leaderboards, parties/lobbies and voice chat, plus collectables and any other bespoke stuff a particular store has) and community management, plus any age ratings and certification/testing each store requires (though PC is usually pretty sparse on this front).

For small indie teams, all of this can seriously eat away at your time, so it makes sense to limit how many stores you target based on risk vs reward.

Edit: btw I'm not trying to be a troll, I just know from first-hand experience. I've been in the games industry for over two decades and have done everything from AAA to running my own indie studio. Indie development is brutal, you really have to be clever about your time management otherwise your risk of failure skyrockets.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Game is Arco.

I haven't ever heard of it; maybe they should focus more on 'How do we market this'...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Its definitely a hard thing for most indie devs to do on their own. Its a totally separate skillset that most of us don't have but can definitely be learned.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

That's what a publisher is for, and in this case they failed them completely.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’m convinced it’s unnecessary if your game is good. Word of mouth is so strong with gamers

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Relying on luck isn't a great strategy, even if it sometimes works.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

There’s no hidden gems in steam. Games sell as well as they should for their quality. There’s margin of error of course like a low quality game sells on the higher end due to good marketing or a high quality game sells low end due to poor marketing.

Most games are just not great

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

There’s no hidden gems in steam

high quality game sells low end due to poor marketing

Self contradiction

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Not to diminish the dev, but I did see this promoted in a Steam sale, and with 200+ reviews, that's not exactly chump change. Also it was released only a week ago. From watching the trailer, that's more or less the numbers I expect that kind of game to be pulling.