1
submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 3 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

New gecko based browsers are rare nowadays but this one is especially unique to me because it is more than just "firefox with tweaks" like a lot of the ones I've come across. The UI is different, it's working on custom settings, a new more powerful sidebar, a new theming system, and potentially IPFS/Dat support further down the line. It's very early in development but it's still impressive as it is.

8
submitted 3 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
9
submitted 3 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 years ago

Yeah same, I don't use my phone for too much, I think with a little more progress I could potentially move over to it for the most part. I do hope android compatibility can be improved though, it would be the biggest barrier of entry down the line. Also I definitely agree with you on updates, it's frustrating that technology keeps improving and getting more efficient and the most of the popular proprietary software doesn't really evolve and gets less efficient.

12
submitted 3 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
2
submitted 3 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
0
submitted 3 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

It's pretty cool. It can use either blink or WebKit and has it's own lower level extension system that somewhat reminds me of firefox's XUL addons.

3
submitted 3 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

It's pretty cool. It can use either blink or WebKit and has it's own lower level extension system that somewhat reminds me of firefox's XUL addons.

0
submitted 3 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

It's pretty cool. It can use either blink or WebKit and has it's own lower level extension system that somewhat reminds me of firefox's XUL addons.

1
submitted 3 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 3 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 3 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 0 points 4 years ago

They only value human lives if it benefits them, it's so fucked.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 4 years ago

Of course. they'll keep making "bugs" that harvest more data until they get caught, and then they'll patch them.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 4 years ago

While I get where they're coming from I do like brutalism to an extent and modern "block" architecture a lot. when they compared these two

I personally prefer the second one. Do I think that all buildings should be brutalist or blocky? no, but they have their place and it isn't insigificant. I also like this too

I personally dislike the "extra-ness" of a lot of classic architecture. I will definitely agree that cityscapes are bland and lost most sense of uniqueness, but I do not think that the solution is regression to classic architecture. I think they also left out a lot of the more friendly contemporary architecture like these and this

[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 years ago

Yeah it's stands out to me because of it's abundance of circles and curves compared to nearby languages like chinese

view more: next ›

SirLotsaLocks

joined 4 years ago
MODERATOR OF