Memes

45731 readers

1058 users here now

Rules:

Be civil and nice.
Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

912

How often had I overlooked women's contributions ? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

227 comments fedilink hide all child comments

One of the comments reads : Actually, we will probably never figure out, was it man or woman. but I thought this comment of the professor was an interesting eye opener. https://mastodonapp.uk/@MarkHoltom/112070436760917344

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I agree that English is a constantly changing language, with many words meaning the same thing or single words meaning multiple different things. It's the case with the male man, derived from werman, as is such with many other words

But your point ignores what I was trying to say

Anybody who feels the need to specify gender with such limited information is simply being sexist. Neither male nor female should be assumed in this instance

This goes for people other than those in the post; scholars and students should be held accountable alike

Whether these historic individuals were male or female is irrelevant. Only their creations truly matter

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I get you. All I have to say is this in response: Its easy to say that specifying gender is irrelevant when the speaker is a man. Women have been forgotten or purposely obscured in history books since forever. There's nothing wrong with positing that a woman may have done X. If there's an obvious potential for female context, why suppress it?