News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
That's just what you think / feel / opine / believe. Pride has many definitions, and people often take pride in their ancestry which they cannot possibly have helped because they didn't exist the entire time they lived their life. Humans aren't fully rational and again, aren't dropped in greenfield without context on a level playing field. Also, you apparently don't feel much pride for your heritage, but you still benefit from it. Your achievements and failures are partially possible and/or caused by your birth situation. If, by birth lottery you were born a Palestinian, you might have died in childhood before ever going to school or college.
Who are you to tell others that their feelings are valid or invalid?
Ultimately, I'd suggest that you take a look inward because I don't think a lot of your problems with these things stem from a logical place either but also an emotional one. To be human is much more than a fancy calculator, and it's perfectly fine to feel various feelings without them necessarily being rationally justified. There is only, in my opinion of course, a problem when people start to use emotions to justify violence or other forms of abuse.
But life isn't generally, and being human isn't certainly:
I did one good thing = I have earned one smile.
EDIT: Outside and inside and in addition to all of this, I think it's perfectly fine and even kind of justified to feel proud of others because we are all ultimately only members of one race: the human one. I haven't marched at LGBTQ+ pride but it wouldn't bother me to do so if someone genuinely wanted me there for some reason, and I take pride in the positive achievements of lots of other people who I did nothing to help all of the time.
You seem to be assuming a lot about my position, and getting most of it wrong.
My only stance thus far is one of definitions. Yes, I know the definition of "pride" has changed, which I'm trying to illustrate is an issue.
Elon's "white pride" rhetoric stems from nationalism, which stems from the conventional definition of "pride", which is:
The pride displayed here is that of perceived inherent superiority, which leads to bigotry.
Rationality and emotion aren't mutually exclusive. Empathy has flaws, it causes people to become hijacked by emotion. Conversely, compassion is a choice, even psychopaths can be convinced behaving compassionately is in their own self interest.
So, I don't accept the assertion that feelings are an acceptable metric for evaluating the validity of a claim. I'm convinced it's wrong to be proud of an identity.
I appreciate your measured arguments here, and they echo my own thoughts over the years. I've always struggled to see the upside to celebrating any sort of heritage. I can't really find fault with any of your assertions, but it's such a classic "white guy on the Internet" take that it reflexively feels bigoted to a lot of people, I think. It doesn't make any sense to me when people take pride in their ancestry, but folk can be happy about whatever, I guess, as long as they're not denigrating others.
And I've always struggled to see the upside to celebrating the community team or whatever, but that doesn't make my opinion more rational, valuable, or human than anyone else's.
"Whatever" "I guess"... These words aren't in here by accident, but this overall sentiment is the one actually worth pursuing IMO without all of the passive aggression.
You and the Aussie don't seem to understand that you're advancing Musk's (and other racists') "arguments" by equating overwhelmingly positive movements with reactionary, retrograde movements that use co-opted words and rhetorical tricks to pretend they're the same thing.
No kidding? Where did I imply any of these things about my own opinion?
Can't say that I've read all of their comments, but I haven't seen them doing that at all, and I'd love for you to point to exactly where you think I equated those things.
Edit: ya ever wonder why you're talking about legitimate events for black people and gay people in a thread commenting about Elon Musk's endorsement of "white pride"? It's because you got "all lives matter"ed and lost the fucking plot.
Those are not my words, nor do I see how either of these quotes is equating white pride to minorities celebrating their own heritage. You appear to be executing a knee-jerk defense against JAQ-offs and cryptofascists, which I completely understand. It is, however, possible to try to have a conversation about these issues while being neither of these things.
Those are my quotes.
I stopped conversing with them after they misquoted me after replacing "rightfully" with "morally".
Don't waste your time trying to change their mind, they've already decided you're the one who's wrong.
The worst part is we're evidently all on the same team, yet we're made out to be Elon supporters.
You're acting like Elon or a klansman (same picture.gif) sat down and read a dictionary definition and came up with this. He didn't.
Of course they're not mutually exclusive, you were pretending they were by saying someone's "correct" feeling of pride can only be derived from their own achievements.
Rationality is a man made concept. Humans are not purely or perhaps not even mostly rational.
What claim are you even talking about? You're the one tossing out claims left and right, like it's morally wrong to go to a pride parade unless you've personally experienced homophobia... Meanwhile you're side stepping the very relevant and obvious thing: that someone acting positively due to unearned pride harms absolutely nobody.
You're getting confused by rhetoric because you're overly concerned about the dictionary definition of co-opted words. Just because it's called white pride and gay pride doesn't mean that the intentions, the events, the attendants, or anything philosophically backing any of it are remotely the same. Straight pride is practically a homophobic hatred event, gay pride is largely a block party with fun and revelry.
It's evident you're arguing in bad faith. I never claimed its morally wrong to attend a pride parade unless one has experience homophobia. I'm out, peace
It's exactly counter to your main position about how only certain people are allowed to feel pride based upon certain earned criteria. But you do you, bud.
I wish you and people like you weren't so simply fooled by tricks of rhetoric as you are. But not only is that unlikely to change, you're likely to continue thinking you're actually technically correct in some way because you have a dictionary definition of a term and think that's an argument.
White pride != black pride
Straight pride != gay pride
Black lives matter != all lives matter
Edit: y'all are right, these things are exactly the same because they use similar language in their names... That's definitely not what a retrograde shit movement would do to try to lend legitimacy to their bullshit.... That's definitely not similar to what North Korea does by calling itself the "People's Democratic Republic of Korea" or anything. /s