Ask Lemmy

26980 readers

1377 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]

Rules: (interactive)

1) Be nice and; have fun

Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them

2) All posts must end with a '?'

This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?

3) No spam

Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.

4) NSFW is okay, within reason

Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].

5) This is not a support community.

It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.

Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

197

Does anyone else feel like tech peaked around 10+ years ago? (lemm.ee)

submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

102 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Sorry if this is a dumb question, but does anyone else feel like technology - specifically consumer tech - kinda peaked over a decade ago? I'm 37, and I remember being awed between like 2011 and 2014 with phones, voice assistants, smart home devices, and what websites were capable of. Now it seems like much of this stuff either hasn't improved all that much, or is straight up worse than it used to be. Am I crazy? Have I just been out of the market for this stuff for too long?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is the answer.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

This is the answer.

I beg to disagree. The answer is 42. The real issue being: to what question? :p

[–] [email protected] 37 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

would be nice, but isn't true according to Douglas Adams himself:

Inspiration for the number 42

Douglas Adams revealed the reason why he chose forty-two in this message .

"It was a joke. It had to be a number, an ordinary, smallish number, and I chose that one. Binary representations, base thirteen, Tibetan monks are all complete nonsense. I sat at my desk, stared into the garden and thought '42 will do'".

personally, i think it's way funnier that it is actually, completely, deliberately meaningless ;)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago

Fucking hell it's true. This is exactly the kind of obscure nonsense I love, how did it take me 30 years to learn this?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 22 hours ago

That's very cool