657
submitted 15 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The article is actually decently well written good-faith satire meant to address how poverty and hunger are inherent to capitalism as a system. The title was just too bold lol

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 108 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

This is such a clickbait, and it backfired.

The actual point conveyed in the article is that world hunger is beneficial for the rich as it allows to operate sweatshops and employ people under tyrannical conditions over low pay, which is not far from modern slavery. Which is super bad for everyone else, hence world hunger must be stopped and rich should get the taste of their own medicine.

But people did react to the headline, and possibly rightfully so.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 11 hours ago

Well i didnt read the article but it depends on the framing. Is he defending the capitalist status quo? If yes then he can go die of hunger imo. If the article points out that rich people benefit from hunger and that this is in fact bad, then thats cool.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 11 hours ago
[-] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Yeah I'm pretty sure the title was a bit of a tragic, click-baity, foot-gun. Lol

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
657 points (96.6% liked)

Memes

45243 readers
1476 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS