51
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
51 points (93.2% liked)
Games
16424 readers
1647 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Yeah kinda my take.
I would've been fine with RDR2 being a bit shorter, frankly, I was kinda dragging along by the end.
True, but the whole "it's time for you to go and be a man!" is a great scene.
They needed to set up red dead redemption and the whole thing of John wanting to walk away from being a bandit
Yeah, sure. I'm not saying the epilogue was too long, just the game overall.
Consider it: did they really need every scene in the game? Are you honestly gonna tell me that every. single. mission. was plot critical or would've made the game lesser in any significant way?
There was a lot they could've trimmed down or removed.
Which, to clarify, it's not like I think the length is a great crime or significantly detracts from the game. I just feel like it would've been better if it was a bit shorter. I'm not trying to compare it to something like Assassin's Creed Odyssey where it's a 100+ hour game and 70hrs of it is narratively irrelevant.