610
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That's exactly why I'm torn. Be pretty hypocritical not to allow it to be applied the other way right?

And it was 25 years anyway for the crime plus it seems there was a lot more going on in this case including a couple other murders.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

No, it's not hypocritical because you're missing (or ignoring) intent. Someone pressures your relative into doing a crime, reluctantly. Now the other criminal gets killed and your reluctant relative is on the hook for a murder they didn't commit during a crime they didn't really want to be a part of.

That is in no way comparable to a mastermind gathering a bunch of stooges for a suicide mission and getting them to commit death by cop.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Fair point.

But here he did shoot at the cops.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

No there wasn't. That was a separate case that we don't know the disposition of. That commenter brought them in but in any court that kind of argument is banned unless they were convicted or it's part of the matter before the court.

this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
610 points (84.6% liked)

US Authoritarianism

727 readers
207 users here now

Hello, I am researching American crimes against humanity. . This space so far has been most strongly for memes, and that's fine.

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: [email protected]

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS